MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236332704 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14664405.v1

Implementation of a novel reactive navigation algorithm

2021· preprint· en· W4236332704 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDijkstra's algorithmRobotComputer scienceTraverseAlgorithmObstacleGraphMobile robotHash functionTerrainHolonomicProcess (computing)Artificial intelligenceShortest path problemTheoretical computer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this project a reactive navigation algorithm is applied to a non-holonomic differential drive robot. The algorithm uses a stochastic process to navigate a robot through terrain while lacking a priori information. A graph is made from a random array of points that is used to connect the current location of the robot to its destination. Dijkstra's algorithm is used to select the shortest route that leads to the destination. The robot attempts to traverse this route until it detects that it is being blocked by an obstacle. The graph is then recreated with different random points, an a new route is calculated. This procedure is repeated until the robot arrives at its destination. This is tested by making a simulated robot with perfect localization travel through two kinds of environments. Processing speed is maintained by hashing location information according to its coordinates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it