MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236614157 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2004.1333697

Morse homology descriptor for shape characterization

2004· article· en· W4236614157 on OpenAlexaff
Madjid Állili, David Corriveau, Djemel Ziou

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopological and Geometric Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeBishop's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorse theoryMorse codeManifold (fluid mechanics)Topology (electrical circuits)Discrete Morse theoryMathematicsCharacterization (materials science)Homology (biology)Persistent homologyMorse homologyFunction (biology)Topological data analysisSet (abstract data type)CombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsComputer sciencePhysicsAlgorithmCellular homologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new topological method for shape description that is suitable for any multi-dimensional data set that can be modelled as a manifold. The description is obtained for all pairs (M, f), where M is a closed smooth manifold and f a Morse function defined on M. More precisely, we characterize the topology of all pairs of lower level sets (M/sub y/, M/sub x/) of f, where M/sub a/ = f/sup -1/((-/spl infin/,a]), for all a /spl isin/ R. Classical Morse theory is used to establish a link between the topology of a pair of lower level sets of f and its critical points lying between the two levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004.Same topicTopological and Geometric Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207