MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236655850 · doi:10.1504/ijor.2016.10000023

Truck loading with weight balancing considerations

2016· article· en· W4236655850 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Huang, Dan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Operational Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransport Systems and Technology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckPalletHeuristicsAxleComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to ensure transportation safety, one main factor in the truck loading problem (TLP) that must be addressed is stability. This paper presents two models of the TLP with weight balancing considerations: 1) balancing the axle weight; 2) balancing the total weight. In the first model, a set of stock keeping units (SKUs) with different weights are loaded on to a pallet, and then the pallets are loaded on to available trucks to minimise the total number of used trucks under the constraints of truck weight limit and axle weight balancing. In the second model, a set of cargoes with different weights are loaded on to a fixed number of trucks with the purpose to balance the loaded weights for all the trucks under the constraints of weight limit. Both models are mixed integer programmes (MIPs). Efficient heuristics are designed to solve these models. Computational results show that the proposed approach can be used to solve the real world TLPs with balancing considerations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Operational ResearchSame topicTransport Systems and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207