MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236698205 · doi:10.1149/ma2019-02/57/2464

The Use of Low Temperature Lithium-Ion Batteries to Enable the NASA Insight Mission on Mars

2019· article· en· W4236698205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsEaglePicher (Canada)Lockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramAstrobiologySpacecraftMartian surfaceAerospace engineeringMartianExploration of MarsMars landingEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On November 26, 2018, the NASA InSight spacecraft successfully landed on the surface of Mars, with the intent of investigating the interior structure of the planet. The Mars InSight mission, which is an acronym for “Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport”, consists of a single lander performing geophysical measurements and studying its deep interior. 1,2 The spacecraft, which was built by Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, is based upon a design that was successfully used for NASA’s 2007 Phoenix Mars lander. However, unlike the previous lander and rover missions to Mars, the InSight mission required a higher specific energy battery that can operate over a wider temperature range, with both charging and discharging from -30 o C to +35 o C. To meet these challenging mission requirements, the project adopted the use of the next generation Li-ion chemistry, which consists of graphite-LiNiCoAlO 2 (NCA), coupled with a JPL developed low temperature electrolyte comprised of 1.0M LiPF 6 in ethylene carbonate (EC) + ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) + methyl propionate (MP) (20:60:20 vol%) 3-7 . This advanced Li-ion chemistry, which was manufactured by Eagle Picher-Yardney Division, has proven to be mission enabling and has displayed good performance over a wide temperature range, including excellent storage and cycle life characteristics. To meet the primary mission requirements, the battery must support a calendar life of four years and operation on the surface of Mars for 709 sols (a duration of over one Martian year). As noted above, one of the more challenging mission requirements is the ability to both charge and discharge the battery at very low temperatures (-30 o C) using moderately aggressive rates (i.e., C/5 rates based on the nameplate capacity of 25Ah). In addition to having to support the power and energy requirements under these conditions, there was some concern that lithium plating on the anode could occur during the low temperature charging which may lead to performance degradation. 8 Furthermore, there was some concern that the low temperature capability of the battery could be compromised by being subjected to long, high temperature operation, making end of mission requirements difficult to meet. To address these concerns, a comprehensive performance test program was under-taken, which included the following: (i) determining the impact of high temperature exposure, (ii) simulating the launch pad storage conditions, (iii) continuously cycling between the temperature extremes (+30 o C, +20 o C, -25 o C, and -30 o C) with periodic diagnostic capacity and impedance characterization at +30 o C, -25 o C and -30 o C, (iv) low temperature charge and discharge characterization (-25 o C to -40 o C), and (v) accelerated mission relevant testing, consisting of 60% DOD cycling over a wide temperature range. In summary, the InSight Li-Ion chemistry with an ester-containing low temperature electrolyte delivered improved performance compared to the compared to the heritage NCO-based chemistry which has been used on previous rover and lander missions to Mars, including: (i) >15% higher capacity and energy at ambient temperature, (ii) superior low temperature performance (-25 o C and below), and (iii) improved resilience to high temperature exposure. Furthermore, the battery chemistry was demonstrated to be very resilient to continuous operation at -30 o C, with no indirect evidence of lithium plating occurring or noticeable performance degradation observed. Thus far, the flight batteries have completed over 100 Sols of operation of the surface of Mars and have displayed excellent performance and health characteristics. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The work described here was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and supported by the Mars InSight Mission. M. Golombek, et al., “Selection of the InSight Landing Site”, Space Sci. Rev ., 211 , 5-95 (2017). M. E. Lisano and P. H. Kallemeyn, 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference , 1-11 (2017). M. C. Smart, and B. V. Ratnakumar, L. D. Whitcanack, K. A. Smith, S. Santee, R. Gitzendanner, V. Yevoli, ECS Trans ., 11, (29) 99 (2008). M. C. Smart, B. V. Ratnakumar, K. B. Chin, and L. D. Whitcanack, J. Electrochem. Soc ., 157 (12) , A1361-A1374 (2010). M. C. Smart, S. F. Dawson, R. B. Shaw, L. D. Whitcanack, A. Buonanno, C. Deroy, and R. Gitzendanner, “Performance Validation of Yardney Low Temperature NCA-Based Li-ion Cells for the NASA Mars InSight Mission”, NASA Aerospace Battery Workshop, Huntsville, Alabama, November 18-20, 2014. M. C. Smart, and R. V. Bugga, U. S. Patent 8,920,981. (December 20, 2014). M. C. Smart, B. V. Ratnakumar, R. C. Ewell, S. Surampudi, F. Puglia, and R. Gitzendanner, “The Use of Lithium-Ion Batteries for JPL’s Mars Missions”, Electrochimica Acta , 268 , 27-40 (2018) M. C. Smart and B. V. Ratnakumar, J. Electrochem. Soc. , 158 (4) , A379-A389 (2011).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it