MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236760935 · doi:10.1109/wi.2004.10057

Focused Crawling by Learning HMM from User's Topic-specific Browsing

2005· article· en· W4236760935 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'04) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Data Mining and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrawlingComputer scienceHidden Markov modelWeb pageInformation retrievalFocused crawlerWorld Wide WebWeb crawlerSession (web analytics)Task (project management)TraverseConstruct (python library)Static web pageArtificial intelligenceWeb navigation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A focused crawler is designed to traverse the Web to gather documents on a specific topic. It is not an easy task to predict which links lead to good pages. In this paper, we present a new approach for prediction of the important links to relevant pages based on a learned user model. In particular, we first collect pages that a user visits during a learning session, where the user browses the Web and specifically marks which pages she is interested in. We then examine the semantic content of these pages to construct a concept graph, which is used to learn the dominant content and link structure leading to target pages using a Hidden Markov Model (HMM). Experiments show that with learned HMM from a user's browsing, the crawling performs better than Best-First strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it