Dynamic interactions between integrative physiology and molecular medicine: The key to understand the mechanism of action of aldo sterone in the kidney
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our objective is to illustrate how an approach that integrates new insights from molecular biology and traditional physiology can lead to the development of new concepts. This dynamic interaction is illustrated by examining the steps taken to improve our understanding of the renal actions of aldosterone. We began by defining the big picture of what aldosterone does in the kidney. This led to the conclusion that aldosterone must at times become a sodium chloride-retaining hormone, while at other times it must function primarily or exclusively as a kaliuretic hormone. The second step was to define the major molecular actions of this hormone. Acting on the principal cells in the cortical collecting duct (CCD), aldosterone leads to the insertion of active epithelial sodium ion channels (ENaC) in their luminal membranes. This active ENaC, however, does not distinguish between the two major renal actions of aldosterone. Accordingly, we returned to integrative physiology and examined a possible role of renal and non-renal events. We implicated the potential importance of the delivery of bicarbonate ions to the CCD to determine which effect of aldosterone will become manifest. This, however, required that we reconsider some of the traditional views in interpretation of acid-base balance. At the clinical level, this global view can help us understand why, for example, a low dietary intake of potassium salts might predispose a person to an elevated blood pressure. Using a similar approach, it is possible to understand how the risk of the formation of kidney stones can be minimized.Key words: acid-base, hypertension, integrative physiology, kidney stones, potassium, sodium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".