MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238608736 · doi:10.1167/18.10.137

Spatial frequency tuning for outdoor scene categorization

2018· article· en· W4238608736 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCategorizationComputer scienceSpatial frequencyArtificial intelligenceComputer visionCartographyGeographyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Which spatial frequencies (SFs) are used for the efficient categorization of real-world scenes? Previous results obtained with the SF Bubbles technique have shown that two SF bands are diagnostic for quick and accurate basic-level categorization of indoor scenes — one around 0.50 cycles per degree of visual angle (cpd) and one around 4.67 cpd (Willenbockel, Gosselin, & Võ, VSS 2017). In the present study, we employed the same technique and paradigm to examine SF tuning for outdoor scene categorization with four natural basic-level categories (coasts, fields, forests, and mountains). The base stimulus set comprised 200 typical gray-scale images per category, all matched in luminance. On each trial, observers saw an image filtered using 20 randomly distributed Gaussian "bubbles". Stimuli were presented in randomized order and remained on the screen until response. Observers were asked to press the space bar as soon as they recognized the scene category, and upon stimulus offset, press the respective key for the correct category. Performance feedback was provided. Mean accuracy across observers was 91.32% correct (SD = 3.64), and mean RT was 451 ms (SD = 107). A multiple linear regression on the transformed RTs from the space bar press and the respective SF filters revealed a significant SF band around 2 cycles per image (cpi; 0.33 cpd) and another one around 26 cpi (4.33 cpd). When using the transformed RTs from the category key press as regressor, only the high-SF band attained significance (27 cpi; 4.50 cpd). Interestingly, the significant SFs closely match those found for fast indoor scene categorization. Additional second-order analyses on both studies' data sets indicate that the significant low- and high-SF bands were used conjunctively. Our results show that people rely on a combination of coarse and fine scales for the efficient basic-level categorization of both indoor and outdoor scenes. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it