MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239527044 · doi:10.1002/bult.2007.1720330201

President's page

2007· article· en· W4239527044 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLibrary Collection Development and Digital Resources
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonorCitizenshipLibrary sciencePleasureGratitudeVariety (cybernetics)Political scienceOrder (exchange)SociologyMedia studiesLawPsychologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When Sam Hastings, as past-president of ASIS&T and chair of the Nominations Committee, asked me to run for president, I was more surprised than anything else. Shortly before, I had announced my intention of leaving the University of Pittsburgh, where I had been a faculty member for 15 years, in order to return to Canada to become director of the School of Library, Archival and Information Studies at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. Weren't ASIS&T presidents American? After all, it is the American Society… “No,” said Sam, in fact given the Society's growing emphasis on internationalization, citizenship and residency weren't factors at all. I'm not the first Canadian to be president of the Society — I think perhaps Candy Schwartz had that honor — but I am probably the first president to hold office while living outside the United States. My year as president-elect has been an educational one. In addition to my deficiency of citizenship and residency, I had another lack — although I had been active in ASIS&T in a variety of capacities, I had never served on the board. The ASIS&T Board of 14 members meets quarterly, at the Annual Meeting, and throughout me year in person or by conference call, including a two-day retreat at mid-year. They are a diverse group who mirror the diversity in the membership — academics, consultants, information professionals, library directors, systems experts. It has been a pleasure to work with them, and you are fortunate in having such a dedicated, enthusiastic and knowledgeable group of professionals to guide your Society. At the end of this year as president-in-training (and I thank Dick Hill for his patience), I have come to appreciate the complexity of the Society, its finances, resources and challenges. I've also come to appreciate the need for continuity, as many of the issues and initiatives that the Society faces are not amenable to rapid solutions, but are shepherded from one president to the next, facilitated by the executive director. When I ran for this office I identified three concerns: membership, internationalization and publications. My year on the board has confirmed for me that these are key issues facing the Society. Membership is an issue because the Society is not growing — and this at a time when changes brought about by the Web have made information in all its forms more accessible than ever before and created new information-related professions. What is needed is first to make these new groups aware of ASIS&T and second to convince them it is their society of choice as a professional community. I hope to build on prior initiatives, such as the membership survey, and also work closely with the Membership Committee to identify strategies to broaden the membership base. The Society has increased its international presence in recent years, largely through the work of a number of committed individuals. The international paper competition, the position of international liaison to the board, the International Program & Collaboration Task Force, and the International Calendar of Information Science Conferences are all examples of this trend. ASIS&T in-kind sponsorship has been extended to a number of international conferences. We have international chapters in Europe and Taipei, and a new student chapter at the University of British Columbia has just been formed. This evidence of internationalization is positive, but we have not addressed the underlying question: What kind of international presence should ASIS&T have? Does internationalization mean more members from more countries? More international chapters? A greater global presence? What are the barriers to international membership? These are interesting questions that I would like to address in the year ahead. ASIS&T, like other professional associations, has a resource in its publications which represent its intellectual capital and which generate needed revenue for the Society. We can be proud of our publications: the Bulletin, JASIST, our conference proceedings, ARIST and various monographs, which are influential and highly cited in bur field. As an “& Technology” society we need to be in the forefront of electronic access and to consider how to make our publications widely available, reducing barriers to access, while ensuring that the complex issues of ownership, authenticity and preservation are addressed. I've presented these three goals: increased membership, internationalization and increased availability and financial stability for our publications, as separate entities, but of course they are closely interconnected. Internationalization broadens membership, greater access to our publications increases our international visibility and a broader community base will strengthen our publications — progress in one area will support progress in the others. I look forward to working with the board, with executive director Dick Hill, with ASIS&T committees and task forces, SIGS and chapters, and with the membership at large towards these goals. When I was elected president of ASIS&T, I received many congratulations… and also lots of advice. This is an association in which the membership is invested; you have ideas about where we should be and how we should get there. I look forward to hearing more of your ideas and opinions in the coming year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it