MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239941889 · doi:10.4000/champpenal.11599

La prison au travers de l’espace architectural

2020· paratext· fr· W4239941889 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChamp pénal · 2020
Typeparatext
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le numéro vise à éclairer l’enfermement à partir de l’espace architectural pour analyser des interactions, des pratiques, des gestes, et des expériences dans divers lieux de détention. Il s’agit de proposer une vision critique, non programmative et non normative, des espaces architecturaux de détention ; soit, de comprendre comment ils sont produits et ce qu’ils produisent. Ce numéro propose ainsi des regards pluridisciplinaires sur des lieux spécifiques de l’enfermement, pour appréhender la multiplicité de l'espace architectural : de la programmation gouvernementale en matière d’architecture carcérale aux pratiques réelles de circulations en détention, de l’histoire de la cellule en France aux enjeux de l'intimité dans des prisons canadiennes, de l’essor de prisons-modèles en Espagne aux interrelations fines en Centre éducatif fermé en France, en passant par la répartition des individus en prison. Les textes sont empiriquement riches, rendant honneur à la singularité des lieux qu’ils visitent, tout en éclairant plusieurs enjeux de l’enfermement contemporain. Ils sont tirés d’une série de séminaires financés par le Groupement européen de recherches sur les normativités (GERN) CNRS : https://www.gern-cnrs.com/. The issue aims to examine confinement through architectural space in order to analyse interactions, practices, gestures, and experiences in different places of detention. The objective is to propose a critical, non-programmatic and non-normative vision of detention architectural spaces; that is, to understand how they are produced and what they produce. This issue thus offers multidisciplinary perspectives on specific places of confinement: to grasp the multiplicity of architectural space from government programming in terms of prison architecture to actual practices of circulation in detention, from the history of the cell to the issue of privacy in Canadian prisons, from the rise of model prisons in Spain to the interrelationships in “closed educational centres” in France, and including the distribution of individuals in prison. The texts offer a rich empirical perspective, honouring for the singularity of the places they visit, while shedding light on several issues of contemporary imprisonment. They are drawn from a series of seminars funded by the Groupement européen de recherches sur les normativités (GERN) CNRS: https://www.gern-cnrs.com/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0050.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it