Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fin de siècle poetry was often both anti-Victorian and anti-bourgeois in spite of the fact that its authors were frequently middle-class Victorians. While Victoria's reign did not end until 1901, during the last quarter of the nineteenth century poetry was moving away from those forms and styles that had come to be considered most quintessentially Victorian. By the time a sense of 'Victorian' values and aesthetics had been recognised and labelled as such, poets were able self-consciously to define their work in opposition to them, sometimes explicitly disavowing any affinity. It is for this reason that the last quarter of the century is often identified with the death of the Victorian aesthetic, and Decadence perceived as the wringing out of the last drops of a faded and over-played aesthetic. Yet, if this was the period in which Victorian poetry died, it was without a doubt the period in which many new poetries were born. In comparison with the lucrative novel, the economic marginality of poetry by this point in the century undoubtedly put it in a different relationship with its recent heritage. Much less likely to be loyal to tried and tested formulas, poetry begins to see itself as avant-garde. What we see in poetry of the period is not so much the limbo of 'transition' to modernist concerns, however, but what Richard Le Gallienne identified as a self-conscious desire for a new aesthetic and a new beginning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it