MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240086313 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.051

A52 ANTIBIOTICS WORSEN VISCERAL BUT NOT SOMATIC HYPERALGESIA IN A MOUSE MODEL OF POST-INFLAMMATORY EXPERIMENTAL COLITIS.

2019· article· en· W4240086313 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Esquerre, Lilian Basso, Fernando Vicentini, Nina L. Cluny, I.D. Lewis, Keith A. Sharkey, C Altier, Yasmin Nasser

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVisceral painInflammatory bowel diseaseNociceptionColitisHyperalgesiaUlcerative colitisChronic painIrritable bowel syndromeGut–brain axisMicrobiomeInflammationSpinal cordGut floraInternal medicineGastroenterologyAnesthesiaImmunologyDiseaseBioinformaticsBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over 20% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in endoscopic remission experience chronic abdominal pain. Studies also show widespread somatic pain in the absence of inflammation, suggesting altered central pain neurotransmission. The microbiome is known to regulate key aspects of the brain-gut axis. Microbial manipulation alters the expression of key targets in sensory neurotransmission, suggesting that the gut microbiome plays an active role in the pathogenesis of chronic pain. Our objective was to determine whether microbial manipulation alters the development of chronic visceral and somatic pain in the post-inflammatory mouse model of colitis. C57BL/6 mice were treated with the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) (2.5 % in drinking water) for 5 days and allowed to recover for 5 weeks. The microbiome was manipulated through the administration of an antibiotic (ABX) cocktail in drinking water during the last 2 weeks of the recovery period. Visceral pain was assessed using the visceromotor reflex to colorectal distention and somatic pain was evaluated using the automated von Frey and the hot plate tests. The expression of genes known to modulate pain neurotransmission was evaluated in the brain and spinal cord. Short chain fatty acid (SCFA) levels were measured in the feces using mass spectrometry. The effects of nociceptive mediators present in the colon were evaluated by incubation of naïve DRG neurons with colonic supernatants obtained from ABX-treated and post-inflammatory DSS mice. Nociceptive sensitization was determined by evaluating capsaicin-induced TRPV1 responses in DRGs using calcium imaging. Post-inflammatory DSS-treated mice showed visceral (p<0.01), mechanical (p<0.01) and thermal (p<0.05) hyperalgesia. ABX treatment induced visceral allodynia independent of DSS treatment (p<0.05) but had no effect on the development of post-inflammatory mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia. Fecal acetate (Fold increase CT vs DSS: 2.03±0.52, p<0.05) and butyrate concentrations (Fold increase CT vs DSS: 2.27±0.44, p<0.05) were increased in post-inflammatory DSS mice. ABX but not inflammation, induced a significant increase in TRPV1 and NK1 mRNA in the spinal cord, and BDNF mRNA in the amygdala. TRPV1 responses to 100nM capsaicin stimulation were significantly increased in naïve colonic DRGs incubated with colonic supernatants from both post-inflammatory DSS (1.55±0.18, p<0.05) and ABX mice (1.86±0.29, p<0.01) compared to controls. Our work demonstrated that post-inflammatory colitis is associated with visceral and somatic hyperalgesia, similar to that seen in IBD patients in remission. Our results suggest that microbial-derived soluble factors may promote sensitization of spinal and supra spinal pain pathways. CCC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicMicroscopic ColitisFrench-language works237,207