Conservative relativity principle and energy-momentum conservation in a superimposed gravitational and electric field
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Post-publication record
- Nature
- Retraction
- Reason
- Error in Analyses;Error in Results and/or Conclusions;
- Date
- 9/5/2017 0:00
- Flagged by OpenAlex?
- Yes
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement — it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
We address to the conservative relativity principle (CRP), which we recently advanced (A.L. Kholmetskii, et al. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129 (2014) 102). This principle asserts the impossibility to distinguish the state of rest and the state of motion of a system moving at constant velocity, if no work is done to the system in question during its motion; such a constraint is thus closely linked to the energy-momentum conservation law. Therefore, the conservative relativity principle, along with the Einstein special relativity principle (which obviously represents the particular manifestation of CRP in the case of empty space), and the general relativity principle can be considered as the cornerstones of modern physics. At the same time, some principal implications of CRP -e.g. the dependence of the proper time of a charged particle on the electric potential at its location, happens to be firmly at odds with the established structure of modern physics and, in fact, is not accepted by the wide scientific community up to date. In the present paper we consider the motion of a massive charged particle in a superimposed gravitational and electric field and explicitly demonstrate that the adoption of CRP is strongly required to prevent the violation of the total energy-momentum conservation law for an isolated system "particles and fields". Therefore, all of the consequences of CRP must be incorporated with the structure of physics, and we show that they are in a full agreement with the experimental data collected to the moment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Physics
- Topic
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Field
- Physics and Astronomy
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- PhysicsTheory of relativityGravitational fieldClassical mechanicsGravitational energyGeneral relativityConservation lawConservation of energyEnergy–momentum relationGravitationQuantum electrodynamicsGravitational time dilationElectric fieldMomentum (technical analysis)Special relativityEnergy conservationIntroduction to the mathematics of general relativitySpeed of gravityNumerical relativityTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanics
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes