MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241072681 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2004.1334471

A strongly coupled architecture for contextual object and scene identification

2004· article· en· W4241072681 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionArtificial intelligenceIntuitionProbabilistic logicArchitecturePerceptionObject detectionContext modelHuman visual system modelFeed forwardComputer visionObject (grammar)Pattern recognition (psychology)Cognitive sciencePsychologyEngineeringImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The context-centered approach to object detection and recognition is based on the intuition that the contextual information of real-world scenes provides relevant information for these tasks. This intuition is supported by psychophysical experiments in human scene perception and visual search, which provide evidence that the human visual system uses the relationship between the environment and the objects to facilitate object recognition. Here, we use a probabilistic model to investigate the possible interactions between object class hypotheses and scene class hypotheses in a visual system. The architecture of the model is based on separate modules interacting with each other via feedforward and feedback connections. A competitive-priors structure is used to implement the feedback connections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it