MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241516098 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14662368

High Level FPGA Implementation Of Adaptive Signal Segmentation And Autoregressive Modeling Techniques

2021· preprint· en· W4241516098 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayAutoregressive modelComputer scienceSegmentationVirtexComputationAlgorithmSIGNAL (programming language)Computer hardwareArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis contains new FPGA implementations of adaptive signal segmentation and autoregressive modeling techniques. Both designs use Simulink-to-FPGA methodology and have been successfully implemented onto Xilinx Virtex II Pro device. The implementation of adaptive signal segmentation is based on the conventional RLSL algorithm using double-precision floating point arithmetic for internal computation and is programmable for users providing data length and order selection functions. The implemented RLSL design provides very good performance of obtaining accurate conversion factor values with a mean correlation of 99.93% and accurate boundary positions for both synthesized and biomedical signals. The implementation of autoregressive (AR) modeling is based on the Burg-lattice algorithm using fixed point arithmetic. The implemented Burg design with order of 3 provides good performance of calculating AR coefficients of input biomedical signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207