MétaCan
Menu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2013
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSound (geography)Fur tradeOfficerDiplomacyHistoryConventionGeographyArchaeologyLawPolitical scienceOceanographyPoliticsEconomic historyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

 Reviews Spanish exploration and empire, Robin Inglis and Iris Engstrand,have helped him bring this text to publication. Bodega’s expedition involved diplomacy, exploration, and scientific investigation. His ostensible remit was to proceed to Nootka Sound (on what is now Vancouver Island) to meet Vancouver and implement the first two articles of the Nootka Convention of 1790, which settled the diplomatic crisis between the two countries over commercial, navigation , and property rights on the West Coast of North America. The crisis was precipitated by the arrest of British fur traders by a Spanish naval officer at Nootka Sound in 1789, and Bodega was instructed to restore to the British “buildings and tracts of land”that the Spanish had supposedly confiscated there and nearby (p.15).He was also called on to survey the coast, extending the work of other Spanish explorers and helping Spain to clarify and consolidate its territorial interests in this vast yet patchily mapped region. His report chronicles his fivemonth stay at Nootka Sound, his encounters withvisitingBritishandAmericantraders(from whom he sought information about the 1789 imbroglio), and his diplomatic dealings and correspondence with Vancouver and Nootka’s NativeChief Maquinna.Tovellprovidesasuperlative sixty-page introduction (with historical background) to Bodega’s mission, and the volumehastwenty -sixblackandwhiteillustrations, manyof themreproductionsof raremanuscript maps, paintings, and drawings. Inhisforeword,thecurrentChief Maquinna suggests that the volume “affirm[s] the diplomatic links shared by our nations and communities ”(p.10).Indeed,the pages on Bodega’s meetings with Maquinna and Vancouver are fascinating. They afford detailed comparison with Vancouver’s own record of proceedings and perhaps unsurprisingly reveal significant differences among British,Spanish,and Native perceptions (see the 1984 Hakluyt Society edition of Vancouver’s Voyage). Bodega captures that with the observation that“one should not make any judgement from a single expression [of opinion]”(p.150).His report also attests to the significance of what Greg Dening termed “performances”(the role of language,rhetoric, bodily gesture, attire, and etiquette) in the shaping of contact relations between Europeans , as well as between Europeans and Native people. Bodega’s charisma shines through his report, as does the late-eighteenth-century language of international diplomacy expedited through the exchange of documents,greetings, and courtesies (letters,speeches,gifts,and dinners ) and characterized by a complex interplay of fact and rumor. This is an enthralling addition to Northwest Coast history,and theArthur H. Clark Company has done a superb job. Daniel Clayton University of St. Andrew Zebulon Pike, Thomas Jefferson, and the Opening of the American West by Matthew L. Harris and Jay H. Buckley University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 2012. Notes, bibliography, index. 256 pages. $29.95 cloth. Young Lt.Zebulon Pike played a critical role in a great national drama when Thomas Jefferson sought to expand the fledgling American nation into an empire during the early nineteenth century. Matthew Harris and Jay Buckley ’s enlightening collection of essays examines Pike’s expedition to the Southwest and his quest for honor, as well as other expeditions of the time, against the backdrop of European influence and Jefferson’s motives and policy decisions.The book also describes Pike’s sponsor — the conniving Gen. James Wilkinson. Between 1805 and 1813, brave Pike rendered remarkable service to the nation: heading major expeditions to the headwaters of the Mississippi River and the Southwest, commandingWest Florida troops during its separa-  OHQ vol. 114, no. 1 tion from Spain,and heroically leading his men to victory in the Battle of York during the War of 1812. He died shortly after the battle, where he was struck by flying debris. As a southern complement to Lewis and Clark’s epic journey, Pike’s critical expedition to the mountains of Colorado further defined the western boundaries of the new Louisiana Territory. As an explorer, Pike brought back a general understanding of the Arkansas River and its interplay with the Rio Grande. He correctly established the longitudinal position of the mountain spine of the continent when many believed the main chain of the Rocky Mountains was hundreds of miles farther west. There are great errors in his maps, however, particularly his positioning of the headwaters of the great western rivers — the Platte,Arkansas ,Rio Grande,and Colorado — hundreds...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it