Desiring Lines: The Pedagogical Responsibility of Art & Design at the End of the World
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter attempts to juxtapose desire as lack, which pervades designer capitalism, against more affirmative notions of desire as developed by Deleuze and Guattari. The framing of this tension is placed against the separate spheres of art & design, which historically have been at odds. Given the urgency of the global ecological crisis surrounding the Anthropocene, the argument is presented that pedagogical responsibility rests on decentering our humanist anthropocentric orientation, especially the way aesthetics has traditionally been taken up by art & design education. The suggestion is made that speculative design and postconceptual developments in art provide a line of flight away from designer capitalism that remains unsustainable. Both speculative design and postconceptual art position the spectator/participant/consumer in the interstice of what is here called “self‐refleXivity,” which opens up future worlds for the transvaluation of the current art & designer imaginary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it