MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242987318 · doi:10.1128/9781555819217.ch54

An Unexplored Diversity of Reverse Transcriptases in Bacteria

2015· book-chapter· en· W4242987318 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASM Press eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetrotransposonReverse transcriptaseBiologyTelomeraseRous sarcoma virusPseudogeneLong terminal repeatGeneticsTelomerase reverse transcriptaseIntegraseVirologyGenomeDNAVirusGeneRNATransposable element

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reverse transcriptase (RT) is generally considered a eukaryotic enzyme because it is prevalent in eukaryotes and was first characterized from eukaryotic sources. Discovered in 1970 in the Rous Sarcoma and murine leukemia viruses (1,2), RT has since been studied for its central role in the replication of many eukaryotic genetic elements including retroviruses (e.g., HIV-1), pararetroviruses, hepadnaviruses, long terminal repeat (LTR), and non-LTR retroelements, Penelope-like elements, and telomerase (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10). Over the years, the accumulated studies of RT have painted a picture in which the enzyme functions primarily as the replicative enzyme of selfish DNAs (viruses, retrotransposons), while occasionally becoming domesticated to perform useful cellular functions. These functions include the maintenance of chromosomal ends (telomerase,DrosophilaHet-A elements) (10,11) and contributions to genomic change (both beneficial and deleterious) through pseudogene formation or other retroprocessing events (12,13,14,15).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it