MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243044048 · doi:10.4310/cms.2016.v14.n3.a8

Spectral results for perturbed variational eigenvalue problems and their applications to compressed PDEs

2016· article· en· W4243044048 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ömer Faruk Tekin, Ke Yin, Farzin Barekat

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Mathematical Sciences · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsMathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the solutions to a modification of the Courant's minimax characterization of the Dirichlet eigenfunctions of second-order linear symmetric elliptic operators in a bounded domain Ω in R d .In particular, we perturb the objective functional by an arbitrary bounded penalty term.Without perturbation, it is well known that the Courant minimax principle yields the eigenfunctions, which form an orthonormal basis for L 2 (Ω).We prove that the solutions of the perturbed problem still form an orthonormal basis in the case of d = 1 and d = 2, provided that the perturbation is sufficiently small in the latter case.As an application, we prove completeness results for compressed plane waves and compressed modes, which are the solutions to analogous variational problems with perturbations being an L 1 -regularization term.The completeness theory for these functions sets a foundation for finding a computationally efficient basis for the representation of the solution of differential equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.258
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Mathematical SciencesSame topicDifferential Equations and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207