MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243170455 · doi:10.4271/2007-01-0208

Effect of Reformer Gas on HCCI Combustion - Part I:High Octane Fuels

2007· article· en· W4243170455 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustionHomogeneous charge compression ignitionOctane ratingOctaneMaterials scienceAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceNuclear engineeringProcess engineeringWaste managementChemistryCombustion chamberEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="htmlview paragraph">Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) engines offer high fuel efficiency and some emissions benefits. However, it is difficult to control and stabilize combustion over a sufficient operating range because the critical compression ratio and intake temperature at which HCCI combustion can be achieved varies with operating conditions such as speed and load as well as with fuel octane number. Replacing part of the base fuel with reformer gas, (which can be produced from the base hydrocarbon fuel), alters HCCI combustion characteristics in varying ways depending on the replacement fraction and the base fuel auto-ignition characteristics. Injecting a blend of reformer gas and base fuel offers a potential HCCI combustion control mechanism because fuel injection quantities and ratios can be altered on a cycle-by-cycle basis.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper describes an experimental study of reformer gas fuel replacement effects on HCCI combustion with base fuels having sufficient octane number to allow spark ignition operating modes. This would be appropriate for engines designed to start and run at high power using spark ignition but using HCCI combustion to improve efficiency and emissions at part load. An experimental study was carried out using a CFR engine which was modified to achieve high compression ratio for HCCI combustion on primary reference fuel with 100 and 80 octane numbers. A variable blend of the base fuel with simulated reformer gas (75% H<sub>2</sub>, 25% CO) was used to alter the HCCI combustion characteristics.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">Experimental results indicated that combustion was retarded by increasing RG fraction in base fuel. It reduced maximum cylinder pressure and maximum cylinder pressure rise rate, leading to a smoother combustion. NOx remained minimal for all operating points. HC and CO increased slightly with RG addition as an indication of lower combustion temperature. It was found that RG replacement with high octane fuels has two advantages. First, it smoothed combustion by retarding combustion timing while maintaining the same λ. Second, it effectively controlled combustion timing when keeping λ and EGR ratios constant.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it