MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243327666 · doi:10.1002/9781119300977.ch12

Residential Care

2018· other· en· W4243327666 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScheduling and Timetabling Solutions
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careAnalyticsScheduling (production processes)Computer scienceOperations researchProcess managementNursingBusinessOperations managementData scienceEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter concentrates on operational questions arising from nurse-to-patient assignments and employee scheduling and routing considerations. These questions are highly relevant at the operational level, but tactical and strategic decision-makers can also benefit from quantitative models to provide insight into the trade-offs that exist in healthcare organizations. The chapter provides an overview of the state of the art in optimization technology, and describes what models would be most suitable to home care decision-making. It outlines new perspectives for analytics in home care delivery, made possible by the emergence of mobile technology, based on massive and real-time data collection. Home care activities determine a patient's care plan, which typically involves doctors, nurses, and other care providers. The chapter sketches some of the most common approaches to solving the scheduling/routing problem for home care delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1520.092

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScheduling and Timetabling SolutionsFrench-language works237,207