MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243424977 · doi:10.1109/ias.2007.156

Fuzzy Self-Tuning Speed Control of an Indirect Field-Oriented Control Induction Motor Drive

2007· article· en· W4243424977 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference record · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Electronic speed controlPID controllerInduction motorComputer scienceController (irrigation)Fuzzy logicSelf-tuningControl engineeringFuzzy control systemField (mathematics)Variable (mathematics)Range (aeronautics)Machine controlEngineeringControl (management)Temperature controlMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field-oriented control of induction machines is widely used in high-performance applications. However, detuning caused by parameter disturbances still limits the performance of these drives. In order to accomplish variable speed operation conventional PID-like controllers are commonly used. These controllers provide limited good performance over a wide range of operation, even under ideal field oriented conditions. An alternate approach is to use a so-called "fuzzy" controller. In this paper, a self-tuning fuzzy controller is implemented. The proposed controller has the ability to adjust its parameters online according to the error between actual machine speed and a model reference. The scheme is compared to conventional PI control and validated by simulation and experimental tests of both control techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it