MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244000369 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14661462

Performance Analysis of Cognitive Radio Networks with Diversity and Faded Channels

2021· preprint· en· W4244000369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioMultipath propagationFusion centerComputer scienceFadingNakagami distributionRayleigh fadingRelayComputer networkBandwidth (computing)Channel (broadcasting)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsWirelessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation presents new approaches for cognitive radio networks that combat fading effects and improve detection accuracy. We propose an advance framework for performance analysis of cooperative spectrum sensing over non-identical Nakagami- A detect-amplify-and-forward strategy is proposed to mitigate bandwidth requirements of relaying local observations to a fusion center. The end-to-end performance of a relay-based cooperative spectrum sensing over independent identically distributed Rayleigh fading channels is also investigated in this dissertation. Specifically, we aim to incorporate sensing time, end-to-end SNR, and end-to-end channel statistic into the performance analysis of cooperative CR networks. We also propose a cluster-based cooperative spectrum sensing approach to overcome the bandwidth limitations of the reporting links. The approach reduces the number of reporting terminals to a minimal reporting set and replaces the global fusion center by a local fusion center to mitigate the destructive channel conditions of global relaying channels. A new approach is proposed to select the location of the local fusion center using the general center scheme in graph theory. We aim to show that multipath fading on relaying channels yields similar performance degradations as multipath fading on sensing channels. With the detect-amplify-and forward strategy, refraining the heavily faded relays improves the detection accuracy. A gain of 3 dB is achieved by switching from amplify-and-forward strategy to detect-amplify-and-forward strategy with 3 cooperative users. Compared to the non-cooperative spectrum sensing, a gain of up to 8 dB is achieved with 4 cooperative users and equal gain combining receiver. Similar experimental set up but with selection combining receiver, a gain of 5 dB is achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it