MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244053068 · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2009.5206618

Planar orientation from blur gradients in a single image

2009· article· en· W4244053068 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPinhole (optics)Tilt (camera)Orientation (vector space)PlanarFocus (optics)Computer scienceImage textureAperture (computer memory)Image (mathematics)OpticsImage processingMathematicsComputer graphics (images)PhysicsGeometryAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a focus-based method to recover the orientation of a textured planar surface patch from a single image. The method exploits the relationship between the orientation of equifocal (i.e. uniformly-blurred) contours in the image and the plane's tilt and slant angles. Compared to previous methods that determine planar orientation, we make fewer assumptions about the texture and remove the restriction that images must be acquired through a pinhole aperture. Our method estimates slant and tilt of an image patch in a single image, as compared to depth from defocus methods that require two or more input images. Experiments are performed using a large set of test images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it