MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244440630 · doi:10.1109/cac53003.2021.9727718

Value Iteration-based Zero-sum Neuro-optimal Control of Modular and Reconfigurable Robots via Adaptive Dynamic Programming

2021· article· en· W4244440630 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 China Automation Congress (CAC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdaptive Dynamic Programming Control
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDynamic programmingControl theory (sociology)Optimal controlBellman equationConvergence (economics)Modular designArtificial neural networkMathematicsIterated functionLyapunov functionDimension (graph theory)Adaptive controlMathematical optimizationComputer scienceControl (management)Nonlinear systemArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An adaptive dynamic programming (ADP) zerosum neuro-optimal control method based on value iteration (VI) algorithm is proposed for the optimal position and velocity tracking control issues of modular and reconfigurable robots (MRRs). An adaptive fuzzy control method is used to identify Coriolis and centripetal force term as well as gravity term of MRRs. The proposed VI algorithm allows any positive semidefinite function to be initialized. In order to ensure that the iterated value function converges to the optimal solution, the convergence analysis is presented. Based on VI and ADP, the Hamilton-Jacobi-Issacs (HJI) equation is solved by using neural network (NN), then the approximated optimal control is achieved. The asymptotic stability of MRR system is proved by Lyapunov theory. Finally, simulation reaults are presented to show the reliability of proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it