MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244710426 · doi:10.4043/otc-20113-ms

Sand Control in Long Horizontal Section Wells

2009· article· en· W4244710426 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of Offshore Technology Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPetrobras
KeywordsSection (typography)GeologyControl (management)Computer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gravel Packing is today the most frequently applied sand control technique for horizontal wells in Campos and Espirito Santo basins, offshore Brazil. Due to the critical conditions, such as the deep and ultra deepwater and low frac gradients, a lot of precision is required to assure open hole gravel packing (OHGP) success. An important scenario for offshore development in Brazil includes heavy oil fields in deepwaters where 2000 m open hole horizontal sections may be required. Sand control options are a major subject and gravel packing is a strong candidate due to the wide experience acquired and the high reliability level in such technique application (if pressure loss issues can be overcome). Among the operational issues related to hydraulics, the following are critical: ECD restrictions, fluid substitution while running the screens and gravel pack placement (if this is the adopted sand control technique).This paper focuses on the following aspects:The Petrobras experience in more than 240 OHGP completions in offshore environmentsHydraulic limits for alpha/beta wave propagationFiltration Control and its impact on beta wave propagationTechniques for the extension of hydraulic limits (rat-hole zero, rat-hole bypass, multiple alpha waves, flow divergence tools, light weight proppants, etc.)A multidisciplinary approach to face challenging well designs for heavy oil reservoirs, including R&D, tool development and field implementationA methodology to evaluate the impact of the sand control technique on the productivity or injectivity indexes.Introduction. Horizontal wells have been adopted as the major wellbore architecture for offshore development in non consolidated oil reservoirs along the brazilian coast. Most of them presented horizontal sections between 500 and 700 m. Most drilling challenges, especially concerning wellbore stability and cuttings transport, were overcome with the experience acquired. The major completion issue deals with sand control: Open hole gravel packing techniques have been especially developed for Campos basin applications. Today more than 240 horizontal wells have been successfully gravel packed in Brazilian offshore fields (Marques et al, 2007).By the end of last century, PETROBRAS started to discover significant amounts of heavy oil in offshore turbidites. Marlim Sul, Roncador, Marlim Leste, Albacora Leste, Jubarte and Oliva fields are good examples of heavy oil accumulations in Campos, Espirito Santo and Santos basins. Figures 1, 2 and 3 highlight the most important heavy oil provinces in the Brazilian coast.Most of the technologies available for heavy oil field production were developed for Venezuela and Canada scenarios, both in onshore and shallow waters scenarios (Wood 2004). The combined effect of deep waters and heavy oils required new technological development, which motivated PETROBRAS to start an extensive R&D program, with emphasis in well technologies, lift and flow assurance, subsea production installations and production facilities and units (Trindade and Branco 2005).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it