Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In her Queer Phenomenology , Sara Ahmed suggests, “orientations are about how we begin; how we proceed from “here,” which affects how what is “there” appears, how it presents itself” (8). Ahmed’s Willful Subjects is about reorienting our relations to willfulness (48) and turning us toward an interest in the will as a cultural phenomenon in need of theorizing, by asking “what is it doing” (17). Through a kaleidoscopic whirl of literary, philosophical, and cultural representations, Willful Subjects makes the will present and active. Ahmed’s diverse discussions provide a veritable romp through the Western history of the will. This multiplicity of texts and images, including killjoy feminists (152), “willful women, unwilling to get along” (2), proceed from one particular starting point: a narrative that serves to orient the appearance of the will – Grimm’s 1884 story of “The Willful Child.” Ahmed explores this story in detail (1) and artfully returns to it throughout the book.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it