MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245357204 · doi:10.1002/9781119516651.ch2

Describing Data Graphically and Numerically

2020· other· en· W4245357204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCategorical variableStatisticsPopulationQualitative propertyMeasure (data warehouse)Sample (material)Contingency tableData miningPosition (finance)CentralityComputer scienceMathematicsDispersion (optics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter discusses basic concepts of a population and various types of sampling designs and describes classification of the types of data. It also describes qualitative and quantitative data graphically and discusses the topics of descriptive statistics. Qualitative and quantitative are sometimes referred to as categorical or numerical data, respectively. The chapter discusses the construction of a frequency distribution table when the data are qualitative or quantitative. Methods used to derive numerical measures for sample data as well as population data are known as numerical methods. Numerical measures are divided into three categories: measures of centrality, measures of dispersion, and measures of relative position. Measures of centrality give us information about the center of the data, measures of dispersion give information about the variation around the center of the data, and measures of relative position tell us what percentage of the data falls below or above a given measure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.317
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.395
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.033 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStatistical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207