Second-order efficiency conditions for $C^{1,1}$-vector equilibrium problems in terms of contingent derivatives and applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study the Fritz John and Kuhn-Tucker second-order necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for C 1,1 -vector equilibrium problems in terms of contingent derivatives. By applying the strong separation theorem of disjoint convex sets in convex analysis, we establish the Fritz John necessary optimality conditions for a local weakly efficient solution of VEPC. We also propose the Kurcyusz-Robinson-Zowe constraint qualification in order to obtain the Kuhn-Tucker necessary optimality conditions. By making use of both the second-order contingent derivatives and the second-order asymptotic contingent derivatives for the class of locally Lipschitz functions in which its derivatives are locally Lipschitz, we obtain a second-order sufficient optimality condition for the problem considered above. As an application, we derive Fritz John and Kuhn-Tucker second-order necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for constrained vector variational inequalities and constrained vector optimization problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it