Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stereotypical image of the scientist is a balding, middle-aged man in a white coat surrounded by bunsen burners or doing unspeakable things to rats. Chambers1 demonstrated that among Canadian children this stereotype can develop very early. In his study children as young as seven drew pictures displaying many of the ‘indicators’ of the standard image of the scientist including lab coat, spectacles, facial hair and/or baldness, symbols of research and knowledge and so on. Hadden and Johnstone2 also found that primary school children (in this case in Scotland) had well developed ideas about scientists, including the idea that scientists are men. Among several hundred children questioned, not one described a scientist as female. Such strongly held ideas about appropriate gender roles may be expected to subvert attempts to encourage females to take up science as a career, or to study it at an advanced level in school. The aim of this study was to assess current ideas about scientists among Scottish primary school children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it