The Use and Social Enjoyment of Murals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The audience for murals includes the cultural tourists so desired by urban and regional policy-makers around the world. The association of murals with 'the people,' the collaborative methods sometimes used to create them, their locations and content all imply a communal audience, a 'public' rather than an individual viewer. Murals located inside public or municipal buildings as public art often address an imagined ideal citizenry, constructing particular visions of nationhood. The role of state patronage in the creation and management of murals is often controversial. Murals were undertaken as 'small-town promotion projects' in the USA, Canada and New Zealand in the late twentieth century. While murals do not have the same relationship to the market as more easily tradable art forms, their site-specific nature means they can be commoditized as visitor attractions through the tourism industry. Revolutionary murals are commoditized and institutionalized. The enjoyment of murals by tourists does not neutralize their political complexity for local residents and authorities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it