Repeated Loading and Unloading Tests of Asphalt Binders and Mixes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Repeated creep and repeated load permanent deformation tests were performed on asphalt binders and mixes. The repeated creep test method was proposed as a new method for the evaluation of the ability of modified asphalt binders to maintain their elastic response; and the suitability of this test method for evaluation of asphalt pavements was studied. Rheological modeling with linear and nonlinear viscoelastic models was applied to describe the material behavior. The second test method, known as the repeated load permanent deformation test, was proposed by the United States National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) as one of the Simple Performance Test (SPT) candidates for asphalt mix testing. The effects of loading, material (conventional base asphalt and polymer modified asphalt) and the number of cycles were investigated. The capability of the Universal Testing Machine (UTM) to produce haversine pulse loading and the resulting responses were investigated. The ability of viscoelastic theory to describe the asphalt mix behavior under this testing was studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it