MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248191080 · doi:10.1002/047134608x.w6605.pub2

Prosthetic Power Supplies

2015· other· en· W4248191080 on OpenAlexaff
Aref Trigui, Sondos Mehri, Ahmed Chiheb Ammari, Jaleleddine Ben Hadj Slama, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximum power transfer theoremWireless power transferBattery (electricity)Electrical engineeringEnergy harvestingComputer scienceWirelessPower managementPower (physics)Energy transferEngineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the last few decades, implantable medical devices (IMDs) changed the landscape of modern medicine. Combining many technologies and employing smart medical devices within the human body, they allowed a continuous and automatic management of numerous health issues, such as pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators, cochlear implants, bladder controllers, endoscopic capsules, nerve stimulators, lab‐on‐a‐chip, and artificial retinal prosthesis. Due to their continuously increasing potential, IMDs are getting more complex, thus requiring more energy to operate. Most of these advanced implantable devices are extracorporeally powered or battery charged through wireless power transfer (WPT) mechanisms. Following the basic principle of IMD power supplies, we introduce various power transfer techniques, and then focus on the inductive links and various methods to maximize the energy transferred to implantable devices and the calibration methods of these WPT techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringSame topicWireless Power Transfer SystemsFrench-language works237,207