MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248426926 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2018.8447836

IIR Filter Design Using Multiobjective Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm

2018· article· en· W4248426926 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfinite impulse responseArtificial bee colony algorithmMathematical optimizationConvergence (economics)Computer scienceFilter (signal processing)PassbandAlgorithmGlobal optimizationMathematicsDigital filterEngineeringBand-pass filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, IIR filters are designed using Gbest-guided Multiobjective Artificial Bee Colony algorithm (GMOABC). Artificial Bee Colony algorithm (ABC) is a stochastic optimization algorithm inspired by the food seeking behavior of honey bee colonies. Even though ABC algorithm can converge to a global optimum for complex problems, the time taken for convergence is longer than classical methods. Gbest guided multiobjective ABC algorithm can reduce the time taken for converging to global optimum and improves the quality of the solutions by tuning the search process towards the global best in each iteration. IIR filter design is a non-convex optimization problem and requires the optimization of both the magnitude and group delay. The results show that, GMOABC can achieve lower passband error and group delay error than the recent results obtained by other methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it