P130. Anxiety and depression may lead to poor health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
142 patients with IBD who were regularly evaluated at a single tertiary academic medical Centre completed self-report questionnaires, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scores, Modified Morisky Adherence Scale-8, socioeconomic deprivation score, and the Crohn's and Colitis Knowledge Score questionnaires. Results: In total, 142 IBD patients (67 with Crohn's disease [CD], 75 with ulcerative colitis [UC]) were enrolled. In the CD group, 30 patients (44%) were anxious and 10 patients (15%) were depressed, and in the UC group, 31 patients (41%) were anxious and 18 patients (24%) were depressed. Using multivariate analysis on data from the CD patients, the factor found to be associated with anxiety was socioeconomic deprivation (odds ratio [OR] 3.95, 95% CI 1.14-13.67, p = 0.030], and the factors associated with depression were disease duration (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.53, p = 0.040) and socioeconomic deprivation (OR 8.22, 95% CI 1.57-43.03, p = 0.013). In the UC group, there was no significant independent predictor of anxiety and/or depression; however, low income tended to be associated with depression (OR 2.78, 95% CI 0.83-9.32, p = 0.096). Conclusions: Despite clinical remission, a significant number of IBD patients present with anxiety and/or depressive symptoms. IBD patients in remission, particularly those that are especially deprived, should be provided with appropriate psychological support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".