Enteral feeding
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Post-publication record
- Nature
- Retraction
- Reason
- Duplication of Content through Error by Journal/Publisher;
- Date
- 3/1/2012 0:00
- Flagged by OpenAlex?
- Yes
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement — it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Enteral nutrition is now the preferred route of nutritional support in malnourished and ICU patients. Studies providing evidence of its efficacy, techniques of administration, and outcome are appearing daily in the literature. This review presents the most important publications in this area and critically reviews them. In this way, the reader can rapidly access important publications from all those that are being published each year. RECENT FINDINGS: A diverse group of studies is covered in this review. The subjects of these studies include the role of enteral and parenteral nutrition in the perioperative patient; reinfusion of succus to promote increased absorption in patients with a fistula or short bowel; enteral nutrition in patients with head injury, in liver disease, and in pancreatitis; bone marrow transplantation; and delivery of enteral nutrition. SUMMARY: Enteral nutrition is an established modality of nutritional support that has received wide acceptance. However, it is not clear in which conditions it improves patient outcome and how to optimize its delivery. In this review, articles addressing the outcome of patients and methods to optimize delivery of enteral nutrition are reviewed. Unfortunately, with few exceptions, most studies are based on few patients or do not have a placebo arm. The usual comparison is with total parenteral nutrition, and in such comparisons, the studies fail to make the two groups comparable in terms of energy intake and the occurrence of a major risk factor for sepsis, namely, hyperglycemia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
- Topic
- Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Field
- Nursing
- Canadian institutions
- St. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Enteral administrationMedicineInternal medicineParenteral nutrition
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes