Implementation and Application of a Hybrid Multipoint Flux Approximation for Reservoir Simulation on Corner-Point Grids
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Implementation and Application of a Hybrid Multipoint Flux Approximation for Reservoir Simulation on Corner-Point Grids Ruben Juanes; Ruben Juanes Stanford University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Jihoon Kim; Jihoon Kim Stanford University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Sebastien Francois Matringe; Sebastien Francois Matringe Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Kent Thomas Kent Thomas ConocoPhillips Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2005. Paper Number: SPE-95928-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/95928-MS Published: October 09 2005 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Juanes, Ruben, Kim, Jihoon, Matringe, Sebastien Francois, and Kent Thomas. "Implementation and Application of a Hybrid Multipoint Flux Approximation for Reservoir Simulation on Corner-Point Grids." Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/95928-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractAccurate and robust discretization of the fluid flow equations is required to account for the extreme heterogeneity of oil and gas reservoirs, and the combined effect of anisotropy and grid distortion, necessary to adapt the grid to the geology. There is a growing need for handling distorted unstructured grids and full permeability tensors that appear after upscaling of the fine-scale permeability field. The classical cell-centered finite difference method results in a 7-point stencil and is insufficient to account for these effects. A number of closely related methods, coined as multipoint flux approximations (MPFA), have been proposed recently and are currently under active development. The basic principle of MPFA is that the flux across an interface between two gridblocks depends on the state variables (pressure and saturations) of more than two gridblocks. MPFA leads naturally to an enhanced finite volume method with a 27-point stencil.In this paper, we implement a variant of the MPFA method for corner-point geometry hexahedral grids. Motivated by the very high aspect ratio of gridblocks in typical reservoir models (ratios as high as 100:1 are not uncommon), we propose a hybrid method that employs a multipoint flux approximation in the areal direction and a two-point flux approximation in the vertical direction. This restricted MPFA method leads to an 11-point stencil, therefore reducing the computational effort significantly. We discuss the implementation of the method in detail. We evaluate its performance on a number of test cases and show that, for typical applications, this simplification does not greatly compromise the accuracy of the solution.IntroductionSome of the challenges of reservoir simulation are related to the accurate and robust discretization of the governing equations, in order to account for the extreme heterogeneity of the medium, and the combined effect of anisotropy and grid distortion, necessary to adapt the grid to the geology. In this regard, there is a growing need for handling distorted corner-point grids1 —eventually fully unstructured grids— and full permeability tensors that appear after upscaling the fine-scale permeability field.[2] The classical 5-point stencil discretization with finite differences (7-point stencil in 3D) is insufficient to account for these effects.In the context of non-Cartesian grids, finite difference methods can be generalized to finite volume methods. These schemes establish mass conservation over a control volume (gridblock) by approximating the flux across the control boundary. Traditionally, a two-point flux approximation is used to discretize the flux across each face of the gridblock. Such a scheme leads, however, to a nonconvergent method when the permeability tensor is not aligned with the grid. Over the past decade, enhanced control-volume schemes have been proposed to properly account for full-tensor permeability fields and nonorthogonal grids. These methods are based on an extended flux molecule that uses more than two gridblocks to define the interface flux, and therefore receive the name of multipoint flux approximation (MPFA) methods. The first derivation of these methods was presented independently by Aavatsmark et al.[3] and Edwards and Rogers.[4] These methods have been extended to two-dimensional unstructured grids[5–7] and to three-dimensional hexahedral grids[8–11] that account for complex geological features such as faults, pinch-outs and deviated wells.[12, 13] These works demonstrate that there are many practical situations in which neglecting the effect of permeability anisotropy and grid nonorthogonality results in large errors in flow predictions. Keywords: multipoint flux approximation, gridblock, equation, reservoir simulation, transmissibility, subinterface, two-point flux approximation, artificial intelligence, approximation, discretization Subjects: Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, Reservoir Simulation, Flow in porous media This content is only available via PDF. 2005. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it