MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249006329 · doi:10.4095/219895

Defining Shaded Spectra by Model Inversion for Spectral Unmixing of Hyperspectral Datasets - Theory and Preliminary Application

2002· report· en· W4249006329 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingInversion (geology)Computer scienceSpectral linePattern recognition (psychology)Remote sensingArtificial intelligenceGeologyPhysicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential of using hyperspectral imagery of canopies to retrieve vegetation and soil information using spectral mixture analysis (SMA) techniques has been the focus of several recent studies. The SMA method estimates the proportion of pixel area that can be attributed to a cover type with a unique spectral profile. Shaded leaf, shaded residue, and shaded soil areas are generally ignored, or treated as equivalent. <p> This paper presents a method of determining shaded spectral reflectance profiles for component cover types by determining the mean multi-scattering ratio (the ratio of shaded-to-sunlit reflectance) and applying that mean to measured sunlit component spectral reflectance. In this method, the multi-scattering ratio is determined by FLAIR model inversion. The resulting component shaded spectral reflectance can then be used as part of the SMA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207