MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249105733 · doi:10.1109/iccad.1999.810678

Model reduction for DC solution of large nonlinear circuits

2003· article· en· W4249105733 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue1999 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.99CH37051) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Electronic circuitNonlinear systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new algorithm based on model reduction using the Krylov subspace technique is proposed to compute the DC solution of large nonlinear circuits. The proposed method combines continuation methods with model reduction techniques. Thus it enables the application of the continuation methods to an equivalent reduced-order set of nonlinear equations instead of the original system. This results in a significant reduction in the computational expense as the size of the reduced equations is much less than that of the original system. The reduced order system is obtained by projecting the set of nonlinear equations, whose solution represents the DC operating point, into a subspace of a much lower dimension. It is also shown that both the reduced-order system and the original system share the first q derivatives w.r.t. the circuit variable used to parameterize the family of the solution trajectories generated by the continuation method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it