Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[1] The 2001 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory was held in Victoria, Canada, May 13–17th, 2001. This was the seventeenth symposium in a series of triennial meetings. The Symposium was sponsored by the Canadian National Committee of URSI and organized by the National Research Council of Canada. It is one of the major activities of Commission B Fields and Waves of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI) and is a well-established event in the electromagnetic community covering a wide variety of the most recent advances in electromagnetic theory and its many diverse applications. [2] The Symposium covers the entire range of Commission B scientific activities including beam superposition, scattering and diffraction, integral equations, time domain methods, waves in complex and random media, inverse scattering and imaging, antennas for mobile communications, periodic structures, guided waves, numerical methods, interactions of electromagnetic waves with biological tissues, and new mathematical techniques. The Symposium attracts leading international experts in electromagnetics and offers a unique opportunity to interact and share new ideas, information and developments. [3] This present special section of Radio Science is comprised of full-length papers selected from 236 papers presented at the meeting. Papers considered for inclusion in this special section were recommended by session chairs or technical program committee members. From these recommendations, the final selection of papers was made by the Special Section Editors, and authors were then invited to submit manuscripts. In keeping with the usual Radio Science policy, all papers were reviewed before the final decisions were made for publication. [4] We wish to express our appreciation to the local organizing committee, the technical program committee and the session chairs for their advice and recommendations. We also thank the reviewers for their time and efforts and the authors for their timely work which contributed greatly to the success of the Symposium and of this special section of Radio Science.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it