MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249893632 · doi:10.1029/2002rs002796

Foreword

2003· article· en· W4249893632 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Staffan Ström, Akira Ishimaru

Bibliographic record

VenueRadio Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)Library scienceElectromagneticsSession (web analytics)Computer scienceTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[1] The 2001 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory was held in Victoria, Canada, May 13–17th, 2001. This was the seventeenth symposium in a series of triennial meetings. The Symposium was sponsored by the Canadian National Committee of URSI and organized by the National Research Council of Canada. It is one of the major activities of Commission B Fields and Waves of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI) and is a well-established event in the electromagnetic community covering a wide variety of the most recent advances in electromagnetic theory and its many diverse applications. [2] The Symposium covers the entire range of Commission B scientific activities including beam superposition, scattering and diffraction, integral equations, time domain methods, waves in complex and random media, inverse scattering and imaging, antennas for mobile communications, periodic structures, guided waves, numerical methods, interactions of electromagnetic waves with biological tissues, and new mathematical techniques. The Symposium attracts leading international experts in electromagnetics and offers a unique opportunity to interact and share new ideas, information and developments. [3] This present special section of Radio Science is comprised of full-length papers selected from 236 papers presented at the meeting. Papers considered for inclusion in this special section were recommended by session chairs or technical program committee members. From these recommendations, the final selection of papers was made by the Special Section Editors, and authors were then invited to submit manuscripts. In keeping with the usual Radio Science policy, all papers were reviewed before the final decisions were made for publication. [4] We wish to express our appreciation to the local organizing committee, the technical program committee and the session chairs for their advice and recommendations. We also thank the reviewers for their time and efforts and the authors for their timely work which contributed greatly to the success of the Symposium and of this special section of Radio Science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5570.496

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadio ScienceSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207