MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250150436 · doi:10.1002/net.20170

Locating a cycle in a transportation or a telecommunications network

2007· article· en· W4250150436 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNetworks · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTravelling salesman problemHamiltonian pathComputer scienceGraphMathematical optimizationHamiltonian path problemHamiltonian (control theory)MathematicsTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Several problems arising in transportation and telecommunications can be cast in terms of optimally locating a cycle in a graph. This paper proposes a classification of cycle location problems under two main headings. In Hamiltonian problems, all vertices of the graph must belong to the cycle. The most important cases are the traveling salesman problem (TSP), the TSP with precedence constraints, the clustered TSP, the TSP with backhauls, the TSP with time windows, several classes of pickup and delivery problems, and stochastic TSPs. In non‐Hamiltonian problems, only a subset of vertices must be visited. These problems include the generalized TSP, the covering tour problem, the median cycle and ring star problems, and several cycle location problems with revenues. These problems are modeled within a unified framework and algorithmic strategies are provided, together with computational results. Several applications are also described. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, Vol. 50(1), 92–108 2007

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it