MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250355050 · doi:10.29309/tpmj/2017.24.01.422

WORKPLACE SECURITY;

2017· article· en· W4250355050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Professional Medical Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorkplace Violence and Bullying
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilityHarassmentTransparency (behavior)CLARITYIncivilityQuarter (Canadian coin)MedicineNursingPublic relationsPsychologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: This study is about female nursing staff whose mission is toprovide professional care to ailing patients, but who are also vulnerable to bullying, harassment,and even assault while they perform their duties. Objectives: The study attempts to describethe level of perceived workplace security among the nurses and investigate relationshipbetween theoretically identified predictors and the perceived workplace security of nursesworking in public hospitals in Lahore city. Study Design: Factors such as civility in co-workerbehavior, clarity of norms of communication with co-workers, integrity and trust of the leaders,awareness of law and legal procedure related to harassment at work place and physicalsettings characteristics—including transparency and privacy at the workplace—were modeledthrough a cross-sectional research design as contributing towards workplace security of femalenurses. Study Period: Oct 2015 to May, 2016. Methods: Multi-stage probability sampling wasused to collect data from 317 respondents working in five public sector hospitals in Lahorecity during first quarter of 2016. Zero-order correlation and multiple regression methods wereused to analyze the data. Findings: Results showed that civility (B=.071, p<.000) in co-workerbehavior, integrity (B=.185, p<.000) and trust of leaders (B=.059, p<.000) is the most potentfactor influencing perceived workplace security of female nurses. Moreover, clear norms ofcommunication (B=.169, p<.000) and privacy (B=.133, p<.000) at workplace also significantlyinfluence their perceived workplace security. Transparency (B=.017, p>.05) in physical settingsand awareness (B=-.014, p>.05)of law and legal procedures were found to be insignificant.Conclusion: It was concluded that setting clear work norms and leadership development inthe areas of integrity and trust can play a substantial role in improving perception of workplacesecurity in female nursing staff. Awareness of laws regarding harassment among nurses needto be increased through formal and concerted effort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it