MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Community-Based Distributed Learning in a Globalized World

2004· book-chapter· en· W4250528104 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIGI Global eBooks · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicE-Learning and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsAboriginal Affairs Northern Dev CanadaRoyal Roads University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial connectednessGlobalizationAutonomyIndigenousPovertySociologyLearning communityKnowledge managementPolitical scienceEconomic growthComputer sciencePedagogyPsychologySocial psychologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through information technologies, there is an increasing connectedness of people in both economic and educational domains. The globalized educational environment is seen by some to be an answer to poverty and other problems through enhanced distributed learning opportunities, while others are concerned that globalization of education is leading to homogeneity and a loss of autonomy for cultures and communities. The authors of this chapter maintain the viewpoint that respectful partnerships can be developed where communities control how their knowledge is used and retained, while at the same time tapping into the potential that the new technologies have to offer and maintaining an appropriate level of quality. Two pilot programs for Indigenous learners, built with this philosophy in mind, are described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it