MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250622789 · doi:10.1002/wea.3507

In this issue of <i>Weather</i>

2019· article· en· W4250622789 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWeather · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimatologyClimate changeArcticEnvironmental scienceVisibilityGeographyMeteorologySnowOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We begin this month's issue with the first in a series of papers re‐examining one aspect associated with the sinking of the Titanic . In ‘ Titanic's mirage, part 1: The enigma of the Arctic High and a cold‐water tongue of the Labrador Current’ on p. 119, Mila Zinkova presents an excellent review of the meteorology of visibility over cold waters and the areas where mixing occurs. At the beginning of 2019, radar used operationally for weather forecasting and hydrology passed a significant anniversary in the United Kingdom. On p. 128, the short paper ‘Radar for hydrological forecasting in the UK 50 years on’ describes the development and use of this essential tool. Chris Collier was involved in much of this development and his review reveals the importance of the project and its value. On p. 130, we publish the last of the papers marking the cold weather and snow of February and March 2018, the others the content of the Special Issue of March 2019. Bill Pike and his co‐authors kept records of the snow cover and other weather factors during the event in Berkshire, Suffolk and Kent. These are reproduced in ‘Weather diaries during the easterlies of February and March 2018’. An important question that is often raised in this period of anthropogenic warming is the effect of carbon dioxide on temperature. ‘Climate sensitivity: how much warming results from increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 )?’, the latest in our Climate‐change shorts series, provides an answer to this rather complex question and one that we all need to understand. Many readers will know that tropical meteorology is frequently associated with thunderstorms, but these storms vary in their frequency by area and time of year, as revealed by Omvir Singh and Pankaj Bhardwaj in ‘Spatial and temporal variations in the frequency of thunderstorm days over India’ on p. 138. The replacement of instruments always presents a challenge – not least, thermometers, the readings from which form the longest climatic series in the world. Almost all instruments have had to be replaced as automation and electronic sensing have come to the fore. A standard form of electronic thermometer and its exposure, together able to reproduce well‐established temperature series, are discussed by Ian Strangeways in ‘The replacement of mercury thermometers in Stevenson screens’ on p. 145. A growing area of research in meteorology and climatology is the association of weather with disease. This is discussed on p. 148 by in ‘The relationship between meteorological factors and the risk of bacillary dysentery in Hunan Province, China’ by Xuewen Li and her co‐authors. As we understand how weather can affect diseases, we can put into place appropriate measures to combat them. Our final paper this month is ‘Brewster's dark patch: a neglected optical phenomenon in the landscape’ – an optical phenomenon little discussed in meteorological literature. G P Können puts this right in his eminent explanation of its formation on p. 154.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2650.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it