MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250837799 · doi:10.48009/1_iis_2021_136-148

IMPLEMENTATION OF DEVOPS PARADIGM TO DEPLOYMENT AND PROVISIONING OF MICROSERVICES

2021· article· en· W4250837799 on OpenAlexaff
Abhijit Sen, Ivan Skrobot

Bibliographic record

VenueIssues in Information Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroservicesDevOpsProvisioningSoftware deploymentComputer scienceParadigm shiftSoftware engineeringProcess managementBusinessOperating systemCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microservices architecture is widely used in the industry to deploy applications in terms of well-defined services along with DevOps paradigm to frequently release features.This paper describes how to incorporate some widely used DevOps tools for the deployment of micro-services.Amazon Web Services (AWS) Serverless architecture is used for the deployment of microservices using AWS Elastic Container Service.The process of deployment and provisioning of microservices using main features of AWS Elastic Container Service will be demonstrated and discussed in this paper with a simple example.We have applied and integrated DevOps tools/technologies to manage and deploy microservices.The example project is one of many projects' students use to master DevOps skills and practices in the course "DevOps Principles and Practices" using current technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIssues in Information SystemsSame topicSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207