Maternal Conduct Disorder and the Risk for the Next Generation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
University of Montreal Conduct disorder is a familial disorder with evidence from twin and adoption studies for both genetic and shared environment effects (Cadoret, Yates, Troughton, Woodworth, & Stewart, 1995; Eley, Lichtenstein, & Stevenson, 1999; Langbehn, Cadoret, Yates, Troughton, & Stewart, 1998; Rutter, 1997; Rutter, Silberg, O’Connor, & Simonoff, 1999). Recent studies have found considerable stability in antisocial behavior from the preschool or kindergarten period onward, suggesting that for some children the preceding period (from birth to preschool) may be an important risk period for the development of persistent antisocial behavior (Caspi, Moffitt, Newman, & Silva, 1996; Nagin & Tremblay, 1999). Given these data, it would seem logical to examine the early family environment, from birth to school age, of children from families with antisocial mothers. Yet there are few such studies (Cassidy, Zoccolillo, & Hughes, 1996; Fagot, Pears, Capaldi, Crosby, & Leve, 1998; Serbin et al., 1998; Wakschlag & Hans, 1999), and little is known about the early family environment of children growing up in families with antisocial mothers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it