MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250923585 · doi:10.1149/ma2017-01/5/298

Tuning the Carbon Crystallinity for Highly Stable Li-O<sub>2</sub> Batteries

2017· article· en· W4250923585 on OpenAlexaff
Youngjoon Bae, Young Soo Yun, Hee‐Dae Lim, Hyeokjun Park, Hongkyung Lee, Yun‐Jung Kim, Hyuk Jae Kwon, Hyunjin Kim, Hee-Tak Kim, Dongmin Im, Kisuk Kang

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallinityMaterials scienceCathodeElectrolyteBattery (electricity)Carbon fibersElectrochemistryChemical engineeringEnergy storageOverpotentialNanotechnologyElectrodeChemistryComposite materialElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing demands for emerging high-energy-density applications, such as electric vehicles, have prompted considerable efforts to design a new type of innovative, sustainable battery. Li–O2 batteries can deliver much higher energy densities than current Li-ion batteries and have thus attracted much attention; however, their poor cyclic stability remains a major obstacle to their use in high-energy-density applications. The carbon-based cathode materials (CCMs) used for Li–O2 batteries are considered one of the origins of this cycle-life degradation, which has led to the development of several alternative types of cathode materials, such as Au or TiC.1,2,3 However, there is currently no practical substitute for CCMs, which exhibit desirable properties such as high specific surface area, high electrical conductivity, light weight, and chemical stability and involve the use of well-known technologies with low processing and raw material costs. This study provides a new perspective on Li–O2 batteries, for which the cyclic stability can be dramatically increased using well-ordered graphitic CCMs. Through a systematic investigation on the controlled carbon, we demonstrate that the graphitic crystallinity of carbon is an important factor in determining the stability of not only the cathode but also the electrolyte. To discern the degradation factors affecting the cathode from those affecting the electrolyte, we used carbon isotope (13C)-based air electrodes with various degrees of graphitic crystallinity. Furthermore, in situ differential electrochemical mass spectroscopy analysis clearly demonstrates that as the crystallinity of the carbon increases, the CO2 evolution from the cell is reduced, which leads to a three-fold enhancement in the cycle stability of the cell. Reference 1. Thotiyl, M. M. O. et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 135, 494 2. Peng, Z et al., Science 2012, 337, 563 3. Thotiyl, M. M. O. et al., Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 1050

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207