MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251341784 · doi:10.1177/0957926504041015

After the Fall

2004· article· en· W4251341784 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscourse & Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJudgementNarrativeDissentPoliticsPower (physics)ExceptionalismAestheticsHistorySociologyShadow (psychology)Political scienceMedia studiesLawLiteraturePsychologyArtPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Just as the study of minority groups can highlight generalities that apply to majorities as well, so the unfolding of momentous events can throw into greater relief existing aspects of the sociopolitical landscape. This is certainly true for the events of 11 September – together with what went before, and what came after. We have had reinforced our sense of the power of perception and image and, therefore, the importance of message, manipulation and positive self-presentation. We have seen aspects of the definition of American exceptionalism, and some of its implications for narrative, policy and practice. We have seen how nuanced analysis and measured dissent have all too often become casualties in a narrowly circumscribed rush to judgement. And we have seen, above all, opportunities for social and political progress unrecognized, ignored or thrown away. The fall continues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it