Separation Logic-Assisted Code Transformations for Efficient High-Level Synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The capabilities of modern FPGAs permit the mapping of increasingly complex applications into reconfigurable hardware. High-level synthesis (HLS) promises a significant shortening of the FPGA design cycle by raising the abstraction level of the design entry to high-level languages such as C/C++. Applications using dynamic, pointer-based data structures and dynamic memory allocation, however, remain difficult to implement well, yet such constructs are widely used in software. Automated optimizations that aim to leverage the increased memory bandwidth of FPGAs by distributing the application data over separate banks of on-chip memory are often ineffective in the presence of dynamic data structures, due to the lack of an automated analysis of pointer-based memory accesses. In this work, we take a step towards closing this gap. We present a static analysis for pointer-manipulating programs which automatically splits heap-allocated data structures into disjoint, independent regions. The analysis leverages recent advances in separation logic, a theoretical framework for reasoning about heap-allocated data which has been successfully applied in recent software verification tools. Our algorithm focuses on dynamic data structures accessed in loops and is accompanied by automated source-to-source transformations which enable automatic loop parallelization and memory partitioning by off-the-shelf HLS tools. We demonstrate the successful loop parallelization and memory partitioning by our tool flow using three real-life applications which build, traverse, update and dispose dynamically allocated data structures. Our case studies, comparing the automatically parallelized to the non-parallelized HLS implementations, show an average latency reduction by a factor of 2.5 across our benchmarks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".