MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252137584 · doi:10.1016/s0731-9053(05)20036-1

List of Contributors

2005· book-chapter· en· W4252137584 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in econometrics · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconometricsStochastic volatilityPredictabilityRealized varianceFinancial econometricsVolatility (finance)EconomicsComputer scienceFinanceStatisticsMathematicsFinancial market

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2006), "List of Contributors", Fomby, T.B. and Terrell, D. (Ed.) Econometric Analysis of Financial and Economic Time Series (Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 20 Part 2), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. xi-xii. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(05)20036-1 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters Contents Dedication List of Contributors Introduction Good Ideas The Creativity Process Realized Beta: Persistence and Predictability Asymmetric Predictive Abilities of Nonlinear Models for Stock Returns: Evidence from Density Forecast Comparison Flexible Seasonal Time Series Models Estimation of Long-Memory Time Series Models: a Survey of Different Likelihood-Based Methods Boosting-Based Frameworks in Financial Modeling: Application to Symbolic Volatility Forecasting Overlaying Time Scales in Financial Volatility Data Evaluating the ‘Fed Model’ of Stock Price Valuation: An out-of-sample forecasting perspective Structural Change as an Alternative to Long Memory in Financial Time Series Time Series Mean Level and Stochastic Volatility Modeling by Smooth Transition Autoregressions: A BAYESIAN Approach Estimating Taylor-Type Rules: An Unbalanced Regression? Bayesian Inference on Mixture-of-Experts for Estimation of Stochastic Volatility A MODERN TIME SERIES ASSESSMENT OF “A STATISTICAL MODEL FOR SUNSPOT ACTIVITY” BY C. W. J. GRANGER (1957) Personal Comments on Yoon's Discussion of My 1957 Paper A New Class of Tail-dependent Time-Series Models and Its Applications in Financial Time Series

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7650.773

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in econometricsSame topicComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFrench-language works237,207