MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252592952 · doi:10.1145/1109557.1109605

Asymmetric balanced allocation with simple hash functions

2006· article· en· W4252592952 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm - SODA '06 · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHash functionComputer scienceSimple (philosophy)Extension (predicate logic)Hash tableDouble hashingFunction (biology)Scheme (mathematics)Hash chainTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that for the asymmetric sequential allocation scheme of Vöcking (2003) one can use very simple hash functions. The hash functions we use are a straightforward extension of the hash functions introduced by Dietzfelbinger and Woelfel (2003). In order to evaluate a hash function a few arithmetic operations and table lookups suffice. Moreover, we show that the scheme has essentially the same behavior if the same balls are allowed to be inserted multiple times (i.e. they may be deleted and reinserted afterwards).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it